Table 1.
Scoring criteria for the content validity (modified from Windle et al. [22]).
Fig 1.
Design and test flow of the ED-RAG questionnaire.
Fig 2.
Five-level scale of RAG and four-level scale of ED-RAG in the potential to respond.
Fig 3.
RAG star diagram with verbalized ratings vs ED-RAG chart with numeric ratings.
Table 2.
Comparison of foci between RAG and ED-RAG (Y or N /number of questions).
Table 3.
Rating scale examples—an open-end question and two structured questions.
Fig 4.
The field test case: Four potentials’ radar charts and overall resilience score chart.
Table 4.
Detailed scores of the test case.