Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Fig 1.

Slit-lamp photography of a cornea with EBMD.

Fingerprint lines, geographic map-like lines, and epithelial dot are designated by arrows.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Fig 2.

Spectral-domain optical coherence tomography B-scan of cornea with EBMD.

A: Presence of an irregular and thickened epithelial basement membrane with duplication associated with undulation and elevation of the corneal epithelial layer. B: Presence of a thickened and hyperreflective basement membrane. C: Presence of hyper-reflective dots in the middle of the corneal epithelial layer.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Fig 3.

Representative corneal OCT epithelium thickness maps (left) and scatter metre analysis with the OQAS (right) of a normal patient (top), dry eye patient (middle) and an EBMD patient (bottom).

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Table 1.

Characteristics of enrolled subjects.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Fig 4.

Epithelial thickness comparison between the EBMD (red), dry eye (green) and normal groups (blue).

All units in μm. Min, minimum; Max, maximum; Sup, superior thickness; Inf, inferior.

More »

Fig 4 Expand

Fig 5.

Irregularity (A) and difference between inferior and superior corneal epithelium thicknesses (inf−sup) (B) comparison between the EBMD, dry eye and normal groups.

More »

Fig 5 Expand

Table 2.

Corneal epithelial thicknesses (in μm) in the EBMD, dry eye and normal groups, as measured by optical coherence tomography.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Fig 6.

Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve analysis for EBMD detection using irregularity of the epithelial thickness.

AUC, area under the ROC curve. For the optimised cut-off criterion of irregularity >3.1, the sensitivity was 0.82 and specificity 0.89.

More »

Fig 6 Expand

Fig 7.

Quality of vision (OSI) (A) and best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) (B) comparison between the EBMD, dry eye and normal groups.

More »

Fig 7 Expand

Fig 8.

Correlation between epithelium thickness mapping and quality of vision.

Top: Correlations between quality of vision (OSI), central epithelium thickness (A) and irregularity of the epithelial thickness (B). Bottom: Correlations between best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central epithelium thickness (C) and irregularity of the epithelial thickness (D).

More »

Fig 8 Expand

Table 3.

Correlation tables between irregularity of the epithelial thickness, central epithelium thickness, quality of vision (OSI) and best-corrected visual acuity (-LogMar AV).

More »

Table 3 Expand