Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Fig 1.

Variant filtering and annotation workflow.

The analysis pipeline included filtering variants based on sample and variant-level criteria for quality control. The pipeline also included annotating variants with gene names, reference population frequencies, and CADD phred scores so that variant counts could be collapsed over a gene’s coding region and so that the analysis could focus on likely deleterious, rare variants. Abbreviations: VCF = variant call format, GATK = Genome Analysis Toolkit, dbNSFP = Database of Non-synonymous Single-nucleotide Variant Functional Predictions version 4.0b1a, gnomAD = Genome Aggregation Database version 2.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Table 1.

Mutation burden analysis of WNT signaling genes in MA and EA populations.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Fig 2.

Distribution of affected genes per subject.

This figure compares Mexican-American (MA) myelomeningocele subjects to European ancestry (EA) myelomeningocele subjects by illustrating how many disrupted genes each subject possessed. Green circles represent MA myelomeningocele data and blue squares represent EA myelomeningocele data. (A) The horizontal axis measures the number of genes that are disrupted by qualifying variants. The vertical axis depicts the number of subjects who possess that number of disrupted genes. (B) The horizontal axis counts only the number of genes that indicated nominally significant risk in the mutational burden analysis. The vertical axis shows the number of subjects with that number of disrupted genes. The vertical dotted lines from either graph represent the median number of disrupted genes possessed by subjects, with green lines representing MA and blue representing EA medians. Both populations followed a similar distribution for how many genes are disrupted per subject, complete with a similar median. However, the Mexican Americans tended to have more nominally significant disrupted genes.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Table 2.

Gene Ontology (GO) enrichment analysis.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Fig 3.

Altered WNT trafficking.

The proteins PORCN, SDC1, and CPE are all involved in WNT ligand trafficking. Deleterious variants in PORCN may prevent WNT’s acetylation which is necessary for WNT to leave the endoplasmic reticulum. Loss of PORCN function would stop WNT from leaving the cell. CPE prevents WNT from binding cell surface receptors on the target cell. Loss of CPE function may indirectly increase WNT’s effect on the target cell. Proteoglycans like SDC1 have been implicated as regulators in WNT distribution, though the exact mechanism is not yet known.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Fig 4.

Altered planar cell polarity.

DVL2, PRICKLE2, and FUZ genes were each disrupted in the myelomeningocele populations. The FZD-DVL complex is necessary to establish planar cell polarity. DVL proteins are also needed to translocate FUZ to cilia. FUZ is essential for the development of a cilium. PRICKLE inhibits the formation of the FZD-DVL complex.

More »

Fig 4 Expand

Fig 5.

Altered β-catenin.

A visual summary of the WNT/β-catenin cascade including genes disrupted in the myelomeningocele populations. The level of β-catenin, which is coded for by the human homolog CTNNB1, is regulated by many proteins in the WNT ligand’s target cell. The proteins CSNK1G, DVL2, DDB1, PSMD3, PTPRU, Fermitin 2 (coded by FERMT2), CPE, PPP2R1A (not shown), and SOSTDC1 contribute to β-catenin’s regulation and all have higher mutational burdens in one of the myelomeningocele populations compared to gnomAD references.

More »

Fig 5 Expand