Table 1.
IOL models object of the study (Group A and Group B).
Table 2.
A—Constant before and after zeroing out the mean error for R factor and ALxK methods, when possible.
Fig 1.
Comparison between median absolute errors by using R factor, ALxK, and ALMA methods in group A (91 patients, mean error not zeroed out).
Fig 2.
Comparison between refractive errors by using R factor and ALMA methods in group A (91 patients, mean error not zeroed out).
Fig 3.
Comparison between refractive error by using ALxK and ALMA methods in group A (91 patients, mean error not zeroed out).
Table 3.
Comparison between R Factor, ALxK and ALMA methods in Group A.
Table 4.
Group B after zeroing out the Mean Error (ME).
Table 5.
Characteristics, data and results for Group B1 (32 patients) and Group B2 (36 patients).
Fig 4.
Comparison between median absolute errors by using R factor, ALxK, and ALMA methods in group B (68 patients, mean error zeroed out).
Fig 5.
Comparison between refractive errors by using R factor and ALMA methods in group B (68 patients, mean error zeroed out).
Fig 6.
Comparison between refractive error by using ALxK and ALMA methods in group B (68 patients, mean error zeroed out).
Table 6.
Comparison between R Factor, ALxK and ALMA methods in Group B.