Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Fig 1.

Non-neoplastic polyps: Fibromyoglandular polyp (A), cholesterol polyp (B), inflammatory polyp (C) and polypoid pyloric gland metaplasia (D) (Hematoxylin&eosin, 10x magnification).

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Fig 2.

Neoplastic polyps: Incipient intracholecystic neoplasm (<1 cm by definition) (A), intracholecystic neoplasm (B), polypoid invasive adenocarcinoma (C) and non-neoplastic polyp (in this case, a cholesterol polyp) with low grade dysplasia (Hematoxylin&eosin, 10x magnification) (D).

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Fig 3.

The flowchart summarized inclusion and exclusion criteria.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Table 1.

Clinicopathologic features and size distribution of gallbladder polyps.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Table 2.

Distribution of cases based on 10-mm size cut-off.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Fig 4.

The ROC analysis has revealed a cut-off of 9 mm, with AUC = 0.854 [0.818–0.889, 95% CI].

At this threshold, the sensitivity was 69.5% and specificity was 95.9%.

More »

Fig 4 Expand

Table 3.

Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values of different cut-off points.

More »

Table 3 Expand