Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Fig 1.

The exploited algorithm in this study.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Table 1.

Variables relating to the recurrence of breast cancer in a dataset.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Table 2.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Table 3.

Frequency distribution of demographic and clinical characteristics of patients.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Table 4.

Confusion matrix.

More »

Table 4 Expand

Table 5.

Frequency distribution of ER and PR receptors in terms of HER-2 receptors.

More »

Table 5 Expand

Table 6.

The test of different architectures of MLP neural network.

More »

Table 6 Expand

Table 7.

The result of the LVQ algorithm for the number of neurons.

More »

Table 7 Expand

Table 8.

A survey of different neural network architectures considering all input parameters in the recurrence of breast cancer disease.

More »

Table 8 Expand

Fig 2.

The workflow of the Raman spectral discrimination model of KPCA-SVM.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Fig 3.

Performance criteria of the seven classification methods.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Table 9.

Performance measure.

More »

Table 9 Expand

Table 10.

Actual and predicted recurrence in the studied patients.

More »

Table 10 Expand

Table 11.

Cancer recurrence matrix of the C5.0 algorithm.

More »

Table 11 Expand

Table 12.

Accuracy of the prediction model for each type of recurrence.

More »

Table 12 Expand

Table 13.

The total amount of disease-free survival in the first to fifth years after the initial treatment.

More »

Table 13 Expand

Table 14.

The most important feature with the highest accuracy in the diagnosis of breast cancer.

More »

Table 14 Expand