Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Table 1.

List of acronyms.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Table 2.

Summary of consistent-VRP review.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Table 3.

Summary of frameworks for VRP variants.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Table 4.

Summary of model framework.

More »

Table 4 Expand

Table 5.

Instance structure Group A.

More »

Table 5 Expand

Table 6.

Instance structure Group B.

More »

Table 6 Expand

Fig 1.

Spatial distribution of customers—Group A—Centered depot.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Fig 2.

Spatial distribution of n = 16 customers—Group C—Centered depot.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Fig 3.

Spatial distribution of customers—Group B—Centered depot.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Table 7.

Experimental design for each number of visits.

More »

Table 7 Expand

Table 8.

Gurobi parameter tunning.

More »

Table 8 Expand

Table 9.

Experimental results ω = 30 visits (Group A).

More »

Table 9 Expand

Table 10.

Experimental results ω = 20 visits (Group A).

More »

Table 10 Expand

Table 11.

Experimental results ω = 60 visits (Group B).

More »

Table 11 Expand

Table 12.

Experimental results ω = 40 visits (Group B).

More »

Table 12 Expand

Table 13.

Experimental results ω = 20 visits (Group B).

More »

Table 13 Expand

Table 14.

Experimental results ω = 12 visits (Group B).

More »

Table 14 Expand

Table 15.

Experimental results n = 20 customers (Group C).

More »

Table 15 Expand

Table 16.

Experimental results n = 16 customers (Group C).

More »

Table 16 Expand

Table 17.

Two-sample mean test p values of comparison of gaps for additional constraints (28), (30), and (31).

More »

Table 17 Expand

Fig 4.

Main effects plots for gap (fitted means).

Groups A and B, respectively.

More »

Fig 4 Expand

Fig 5.

Interaction plots of significant factors.

Groups A and B, respectively.

More »

Fig 5 Expand