Table 1.
Demographical characteristics (N = 105).
Table 2.
Echocardiographic characteristics (N = 105).
Table 3.
Detailed presentation of the difference between the original and modified MIDA score.
Fig 1.
Predictive values of each parameter according to the ROC analysis.
(AF: Atrial fibrillation, LAD: Left atrial diameter, LVEF: Left ventricular ejection fraction, LVESD: Left ventricular end-systolic diameter, RVSP: Right ventricular systolic pressure).
Fig 2.
Scatter diagram showing the linear relationship between the original and modified MIDA score.
Table 4.
Statistical re-weighting of parameters for the modified MIDA Score and re-arrangement of the point distribution using the Cox proportional hazard analysis.
Table 5.
The adjusted multivariate regression analysis: Only age>75 and age>75 & presence of atrial fibrillation.
Fig 3.
Prediction capability of the modified MIDA Score concerning the combined endpoint: The ROC analysis.
Fig 4.
Presentation of survival according to grades of the modified MIDA Score: The Kaplan-Meier curve.
Table 6.
Risk stratification of the modified MIDA Score concerning the combined endpoint: A detailed list with point distribution using the cox proportional hazards regression analysis.
Fig 5.
Probability of the combined endpoint in grades of the modified MIDA score: The Logistic regression analysis.
Table 7.
Predictive values of grades of the modified MIDA Score: The Logistic regression analysis.
Fig 6.
Comparison of score systems in FMR patients: Comparison of ROC curves.
(AUC: Area under the curve, STS: The Society of Thoracic Surgeons, MIDA: The Mitral Regurgitation International Database).