Table 1.
Cut-off values for visual assessment.
Table 2.
Visual functions, test devices and test procedures.
Table 3.
Psychological functions and description of test procedures.
Fig 1.
Participant’s driving performance participants.
Drivers were grouped post-hoc based on their overall driving perfcormance scores. A cut-off of 2.5 was chosen for indicating those drivers who might fail a licensing test (labeled “Possibly unfit to drive”).
Table 4.
Driving characteristics of the sample.
Table 5.
Fitness to drive and demographics.
Table 6.
Visual performance indicators for the participants by group.
Table 7.
Multiple regression of visual performance indicators (backward elimination of variables).
Table 8.
Psychological performance indicators.
Table 9.
Multiple regression of psychological performance indicators.
Table 10.
Multiple regression of visual and attentional performance indicators.
Table 11.
Predicting fitness to drive.
Table 12.
Identifying best predictors for fitness to drive.