Fig 1.
Viral shedding probability distributions (Pc).
(A) H1N1 influenza. (B) SARS virus.
Table 1.
Formulations for generating mechanism-specific probability distributions.
Table 2.
Numerical values and ranges of the parameters used in the multiscale model.
Fig 2.
Replication of real life pedestrian motion in queues using simulations.
(A) Schematic representation of an actual pedestrian queue in an entertainment venue. (B) Simulation snapshot of a corresponding model.
Fig 3.
Evolution of pedestrians (t = 125s) from simulation of double queue rectangular layouts.
(A) Configuration 1. (B) Configuration 2. (C) Configuration 3. (D) Configuration 4.
Fig 4.
Infection distribution profile for the different configurations at Pinf = 0.025 and R = 1.2m with rope separation.
Fig 5.
Infection distribution profile for different double queue configurations at a contact radius of 1.2m.
(A) The rope is used for separation between the rows. (B) The temporary shading walls are used for separation between the rows.
Fig 6.
Infection distribution profile for different double queue configurations at a contact radius of 2.1 m.
(A) The rope is used for separation between the rows. (B) The temporary shading walls are used for separation between the rows.
Fig 7.
Contact distribution profile for different queue configurations with varying contact radii.
(A) Rope separators used between the rows. (B) Walls used for separation between the rows.
Fig 8.
Evolution of pedestrians (t = 125s) from a simulation of abreast queue square layouts.
(A) Configuration 1. (C) Configuration 2. (B) Configuration 3. (D) Configuration 4.
Fig 9.
Infection distribution profile for different double queue configurations at a contact radius of 1.2 m.
(A) Rope stanchions are used for separation between the rows. (B) Wall separators are used for separation between the rows.
Fig 10.
Infection distribution profile for different double queue configurations at a contact radius of 2.1 m.
(A) Rope stanchions are used for separation between the rows. (B) Wall separators are used for separation between the rows.
Fig 11.
Contact distribution profile for different queue configurations with varying contact radii.
(A) Rope separators used between the rows. (B) Walls used for separation between the rows.
Fig 12.
Comparison of the number of contacts between different configurations and queue arrangements.
(A) Rope separators and walls for rectangular and square layout for configuration 3 with a contact radius of 1.2 m. (B) A similar comparison for the rectangular layout between the default and a single file queue setup.