Fig 1.
Flowchart of literature search.
Table 1.
Characteristics of included cohorts.
Fig 2.
Forest plot of relationship between 1 mmHg increment in SD-SBP and risk of CKD.
Boxes represent the Relative risk (RR) and lines represent the 95% Confidence Intervals (CIs) for individual studies. The area of each square is proportional to study weight. The diamonds and their width represent the pooled RRs and the 95% CIs, respectively.
Fig 3.
Forest plot of relationship between 1% increment in CV-SBP and risk of CKD.
Boxes represent the Relative risk (RR) and lines represent the 95% Confidence Intervals (CIs) for individual studies. The area of each square is proportional to study weight. The diamonds and their width represent the pooled RRs and the 95% CIs, respectively.
Fig 4.
Forest plot of relationship between 1 increment in VIM-SBP and risk of CKD.
Boxes represent the Relative risk (RR) and lines represent the 95% Confidence Intervals (CIs) for individual studies. The area of each square is proportional to study weight. The diamonds and their width represent the pooled RRs and the 95% CIs, respectively.
Fig 5.
Forest plot of relationship between 1 mmHg increment in SD-DBP and risk of CKD.
Boxes represent the Relative risk (RR) and lines represent the 95% Confidence Intervals (CIs) for individual studies. The area of each square is proportional to study weight. The diamonds and their width represent the pooled RRs and the 95% CIs, respectively.
Fig 6.
Forest plot of relationship between 1% increment in CV-DBP and risk of CKD.
Boxes represent the Relative risk (RR) and lines represent the 95% Confidence Intervals (CIs) for individual studies. The area of each square is proportional to study weight. The diamonds and their width represent the pooled RRs and the 95% CIs, respectively.
Table 2.
Subgroup analyses of 1mmHg increment in SD-SBP and risk of CKD.
Fig 7.
Publication bias using Egger test.
Fig 8.
The sensitivity analysis regarding the BPV SD for CKD.