Fig 1.
SEM image of Neurobasis Daviesi wing.
Fig 2.
Odonata classification and diversity of the dataset.
Fig 3.
Total number of species and its population.
Table 1.
Photographic acquisition data and measurement configurations.
Fig 4.
Image capture situation.
Fig 5.
(a) 3D reconstruction of a 2D model of dragonfly wing progress flowchart, (b) 3D reconstruction of a 2D model of dragonfly wing created in Zephyr Pro software taking a photograph, dense point cloud, mesh surface and textured mesh from left to right, respectively.
Table 2.
Accuracy of photogrammetry on the metal block and screw pitch gauge selected standards.
Fig 6.
Three-dimensional laser scanning of the right side of the Neurobasis daviesi wing.
Fig 7.
3D geometry of the isolated fore and hind wing of Petaluridae, Petalura, the dimension of fore wing and hind wing are 84.42 and 84.77 respectively.
Fig 8.
(a) Transparent flat wing and (b) vacuum table setup.
Fig 9.
(a) 3D visualization and (b) cross-section of the HW of the Orthetrum caledonicum obtained by Micro-CT.
Fig 10.
Corrugation structures measured at different sections along the HW of the Orthetrum caledonicum obtained by photogrammetry and Micro-CT.
Fig 11.
Corrugation patterns at three stations along the HW of (a) Cordulegaster Boltonii and (b) Neurobasis Chinensis Indonesia obtained by photogrammetry and Micro-CT.
Fig 12.
Forewing dragonfly 3D printed and Forewing dragonfly mold made by CNC.
Fig 13.
Comparison of wings at three section of the 3D model vs fabricated wing.