Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Table 1.

Comparisons of social anxiety disorder (SAD) patients and healthy controls (HC) on NEO-PI-R Big Five dimensions.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Table 2.

Logistic regression analysis of Revised NEO Personality Inventory personality predictors of diagnostic group, i.e. social anxiety disorder or healthy control.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Table 3.

Comparison of social anxiety disorder (SAD) patients and Healthy Controls (HC) on the Karolinska Scales of Personality.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Fig 1.

Cluster analysis solution.

(a) Predictor importance of the five personality dimensions in the two-step cluster analysis with extraversion showing highest importance; (b) Distribution of social anxiety disorder (SAD) patients across the three resultant clusters; (c) Differences between the three SAD clusters on the five personality dimensions used as cluster variables. Healthy controls (n = 138) are also displayed for informatory purposes. Error bars represent standard errors.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Table 4.

Mean values (SD) and ANOVA results on the NEO-PI-R Big Five dimensions in three clusters of social anxiety disorder (SAD) patients compared with healthy controls (HC).

More »

Table 4 Expand

Fig 2.

Distribution of three clusters of social anxiety disorder patients and healthy controls along the neuroticism and extraversion dimensions.

The crosshair denotes Swedish norm values for neuroticism (M = 78.0, SD = 22.5) and extraversion (M = 107.6, SD = 20.7) respectively.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Table 5.

Mean values (SD) and ANOVA results on the six profiling variables in the three clusters of social anxiety disorder.

More »

Table 5 Expand