Table 1.
EPICES items and proportion of yes answers by subpopulations (INDIA study, N = 1 553).
Table 2.
Population characteristics (INDIA study, N = 1 553).
Fig 1.
probability of answering according to level of precariousness for items with DIF in geographical areas analysis (INDIA study).
Table 3.
DIF significance and intensity for each comparison (INDIA study N = 1553).
Fig 2.
Probability of answering according to level of precariousness for items with DIF in age and gender analysis (INDIA study).
Table 4.
% of variance and item contribution resulting from the MCAs after rotation, on the whole sample as well as in geographical areas groups, with 11 items and 10 items (INDIA study, N = 1553).
Fig 3.
Correlation between EPICES score and estimated latent variable with and without DIFs.