Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Table 1.

Sample characteristics at Phase I.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Fig 1.

Sample stimuli from Eye Contact Detection Task.

Example of stimuli for one actor in the Eye Contact Detection Task. Gaze angles ranged from 30° (averted; signal strength = 0) to 0° (direct; signal strength = 1) in ten 10% increments. The task used face stimuli with both forward (top 2 panels) and deviated (bottom 2 panels) head orientations.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Fig 2.

Sample curve-fitting for Eye Contact Detection Task data.

A logistic function was fitted to each participant’s Eye Contact Detection Task data (separately for forward and deviated faces) in order to derive two measures of eye contact perception: self-referential tendency (threshold at 50% eye contact endorsement) and perceptual precision (slope at y = 50%).

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Fig 3.

Eye contact endorsement rates across signal strengths.

Mean percentage of “Yes–looking at me” responses plotted against eye contact signal strength, calculated separately for forward/deviated faces. Error bars shown represent standard error.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Table 2.

Descriptives for measures of eye contact perception, social cognition, and related psychological traits.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Table 3.

Test-retest reliability (intra-class correlation) of measures obtained from Eye Contact Detection Task.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Table 4.

Pearson correlations between measures of eye contact perception, social cognition, and related psychological constructs.

More »

Table 4 Expand

Table 5.

Hierarchal regression on ER-40 and RME with eye contact perception measures as predictors.

More »

Table 5 Expand