Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Fig 1.

(A) Categorization according to the standardized MNA-SF score. (B) Categorization according to the standardized MNA-LF score. (C) Categorization according to the MNA-LF-new score. (D) Categorization according to the MNA-LF-ESKD score.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Fig 2.

ROC curve for the MNA-LF using dichotomized MNA-SF (normal nutritional status versus at risk/malnourished) as referent.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Fig 3.

(A) Re-categorization between MNA-SF and MNA-LF. (B) Re-categorization between MNA-SF and MNA-LF-new. (C) Re-categorization between MNA-SF and MNA-LF-ESKD.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Table 1.

Characteristics of the study population in the different malnutrition subgroups based on MNA-SF.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Table 2.

Characteristics of the study population in different subgroups based on the mortality status.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Table 3.

Univariate Cox regressions for mortality.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Table 4.

Multivariate Cox regression.

More »

Table 4 Expand

Fig 4.

Survival in function of MNA-SF score, adjusted for age, gender and Davies Stoke Score.

More »

Fig 4 Expand

Table 5.

Multivariate binary logistic regression for mortality at 2 years.

More »

Table 5 Expand