Fig 1.
(A) South America highlighting the Brazilian Amazon; (B) The deforestation Arc in hatch and the Paragominas municipality in red; (C) Limits of the study area and the spatial distribution of the 35 sampling points (camera traps) in the different habitats. Reprinted from [28] [29] under a CC BY license, with permission from [IMAZON and EOS], original copyright [2013].
Fig 2.
Predictor variables selected by the mixed generalized linear models and the size of the effect for each species.
Detail of the effect size and the influence, positive or negative, of each variable for each species. Variables analyzed: (A) Proportion of degraded mature forest (MF), (B) Distance from the degraded mature forest (DF), (C) Average canopy opening (CO), (D) Distance from permanent watercourses (DW), (E) Distance from the mining (DM). Species analyzed from left to right in the X axes of each plot: M. tridactyla (Giant anteater); P. maximus (Giant armadillo); T. terrestris (Lowland tapir); T. pecari (White-lipped peccary).
Table 1.
Results for predictor variables selected by the GLMM.
Models for M. tridactyla (Giant anteater), P. maximus (Giant armadillo), T. terrestris (Lowland tapir) and T. pecari (White-lipped peccary).
Fig 3.
Comparison of the abundance rate averages between habitats and its confidence intervals (95% of confidence).
(A) M. tridactyla (Giant anteater), (B) P. maximus (Giant armadillo), (C) T. terrestris (Lowland tapir) and (D) T. pecari (White-lipped peccary).
Fig 4.
Distribution of each species in the sampled habitat types.
(A) M. tridactyla (Giant anteater), (B) P. maximus (Giant armadillo), (C) T. terrestris (Lowland tapir) and (D) T. pecari (White-lipped peccary). Reprinted from [28] [29] under a CC BY license, with permission from [IMAZON and EOS], original copyright [2013].