Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Table 1.

Characteristics of the subjects and scores for the different questionnaires.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Table 2.

Oblimin oblique-rotated factor loadings for all TAPES-R-F items of the psychosocial adjustment scale.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Fig 1.

a, b, c, d, e category probability curves of the different subscales of the TAPES-R-F.

The y-axis represents the probability of responding to one of the rating categories. The x-axis represents the different performance values.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Table 3.

Correlations and confidence intervals between the subscales of the TAPES-R-F and the subscales of BPI, SF-36 and HADs.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Table 4.

TAPES-R-F subscores in function of PPA answers and associations with p-values.

More »

Table 4 Expand

Table 5.

Standard error of measurement and smallest detectable change for individual and group for the different subscales of the TAPES-R-F.

More »

Table 5 Expand

Table 6.

Mean difference in TAPES-R-F subscores between test and retest, the limits of agreement, ICC and 95% confidence interval.

More »

Table 6 Expand

Table 7.

Number of subjects who reached the minimum and the maximum values for the six subscales of the TAPES-R-F.

More »

Table 7 Expand