Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Table 1.

Characteristics of study participants.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Table 2.

Measured values during ultrasound (PWV and CIMT) and IHE-IRM in healthy controls and children with type 1 diabetes mellitus.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Fig 1.

Representative MR images.

Representative MR anatomical and flow velocity images during measurement of coronary vasomotor response of the right coronary artery (RCA) to handgrip exercise. Representative images obtained from a child with A) T1DM (left panel) and B) a healthy control (right panel). (a) double oblique scout scan obtained in parallel to the RCA. (b) cross-sectional images of the RCA acquired at rest (baseline). (c) cross-sectional images of the RCA during isometric handgrip stress. The vessel lumen area is represented by the red line.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Fig 2.

Hemodynamic effects of exercise during IHE-MRI measured by rate pressure product change in healthy (white boxes) and children with type 1 diabetes mellitus (black boxes). Both groups show significant increase in the rate pressure product during handgrip confirming the usability of the IHE-method to induce stress. Children with T1D had a higher but not significant baseline rate pressure product.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Fig 3.

Comparison of changes in coronary cross-sectional area during IHE.

The white boxes represent the mean volumetric change in mm2 of coronary artery area in healthy children. A: The black boxes represent the mean volumetric change in mm2 of coronary artery area in patients with Type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM). B: individual changes in coronary cross-sectional area.

More »

Fig 3 Expand