Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Table 1.

Diagnostic criteria for non-strabismic binocular vision anomalies.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Table 2.

Comparison of mean and standard deviation values for the measures of binocular function.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Table 3.

Prevalence of binocular vision anomalies.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Fig 1.

ROC curves for NPC and Sheard’s and Percival’s criterion according to the combined CI groups.

Blue solid line: NPC, red dotted line: Sheard’s criterion for near, dashed line: Percival’s criterion for near, diagonal line: no discrimination (AUC = 0.5).

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Table 4.

Results for the area under the curve (AUC) in ROC curve analysis among CI, non-CI, and NBV groups.

More »

Table 4 Expand

Table 5.

Diagnostic validity of NPC and Sheard’s and Percival’s criterion by using cut-offs derived from ROC curve analysis.

More »

Table 5 Expand