Table 1.
Descriptive statistics of women and men’s depressive symptoms and perceived equity of dyadic coping across TTP.
Fig 1.
Perceived equity of dyadic coping across the TTP.
Table 2.
Associations between depressive symptoms and equity of dyadic coping across the TTP.
Fig 2.
Regressions of women’s depressive symptoms on women’s perceived equity.
Note. DC = dyadic coping. Significant curvilinear association between women’s equity and women’s depressive symptoms (actor effect) as visible by lower depressive symptoms along the line of equity (front to back corner) where provided and received dyadic coping are perceived to be the same. Linear associations were not significant as visible by higher depressive symptoms in either direction of inequity, i.e., higher depressive symptoms in the case of overbenefit (received > provided DC; left corner) or underbenefit (received < provided DC; right corner).
Fig 3.
Regression of men’s depressive symptoms on women’s perceived equity (partner effects).
Note. DC = dyadic coping. Significant curvilinear association between women’s equity and men’s depressive symptoms (partner effect) as visible by lower depressive symptoms in men along the line of equity as perceived by their female partners (front to back corner) where provided and received dyadic coping are perceived to be the same. Linear associations were not significant as visible by higher depressive symptoms in either direction of inequity (i.e., in the case of overbenefit (received > provided DC; left corner) or underbenefit (received < provided DC; right corner)).