Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Fig 1.

C&C architecture of the proposed P2P botnet model.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Fig 2.

The process of downstream communication.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Fig 3.

The process of upstream communication.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Fig 4.

The disguised Version Handshake.

More »

Fig 4 Expand

Table 1.

The definition of network properties.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Table 2.

Properties of the constructed P2P botnet.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Fig 5.

The distribution of the current number of sensor bots in peer lists.

More »

Fig 5 Expand

Fig 6.

A network overview of the simulated botnet.

More »

Fig 6 Expand

Fig 7.

A network overview of the pre-constructed P2P botnet deployed on cloud platforms.

More »

Fig 7 Expand

Fig 8.

The data structure of the upstream message.

More »

Fig 8 Expand

Table 3.

Peak value and max value of the path length from a regular bot to a sensor bot under different pr.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Fig 9.

Comparison of the Eq (7) and simulation results with different TTLup.

More »

Fig 9 Expand

Fig 10.

Performance of BFS (a), DFS (b) and LICA (c) on different anti-crawling strategies (Sreturn = 4, M = 20).

More »

Fig 10 Expand

Fig 11.

Performance of Random (a) and ZeusMilker (b) on different anti-crawling strategies (Sreturn = 4, M = 20).

More »

Fig 11 Expand

Fig 12.

The network traffic of (a) running the Bitcoin Core client and (b) DUSTBot in the same network environment within 15 minutes.

More »

Fig 12 Expand