Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Fig 1.

Diabetes care cascade framework.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Table 1.

Demographic characteristics of analytic sample and prevalence of diabetes, NHES-V Thailand, 2014.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Fig 2.

Diabetes care cascade, Thailand 2014.

Point estimates are shown, with 95% confidence intervals in brackets. Among all people with diabetes, 67.0% were ever screened for diabetes (33.0% relative loss), 34.0% were ever diagnosed (49.3% loss), 33.3% were ever treated (2.0% loss), and 26.0% were controlled with fasting plasma glucose <183 mg/dL (21.9% relative loss). Unmet need was 74.0% across the care cascade.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Fig 3.

Regional diabetes care cascade, Thailand 2014.

Point estimates are shown, with 95% confidence interval bars. Within different regions (North, Central, Northeast, South, Bangkok), people with diabetes had different rates of attrition across the care cascade. Among people with diabetes, the Northeast had the lowest rates of control (21.8%), while South had the highest rates of control (47.9%).

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Table 2.

Factors associated with diabetes care cascade retention, Thailand 2014.

Un-nested logistic regression.

More »

Table 2 Expand