Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Table 1.

Description and source of publicly available outgroup data on 274 individuals across 11 breeds.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Fig 1.

Average linkage disequilibrium (LD) decay in Angler (RVA), Red-and-White dual-purpose (RDN) and Red Holstein (RH).

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Fig 2.

Trends in LD based effective population size for Angler (RVA), Red-and-White dual-purpose (RDN) and Red Holstein (RH).

A) Across 1000 generation and B) across 52 generations ago.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Table 2.

Number of animals (N), average genomic relationship (Ø gRel), average observed heterozygosity (Ho) and most recent effective population size (Ne5Gen) for Angler (RVA), Red-and-White dual-purpose (RDN) and Red Holstein (RH).

More »

Table 2 Expand

Fig 3.

Frequency distribution of the number of ROH in different length classes for Angler (RVA), Red-and-White dual-purpose (RDN) and Red Holstein (RH).

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Table 3.

Number of animals with and without identified ROH, total and average number of ROH per breed and average sum of ROH segment lengths for Angler (RVA), Red-and-White dual-purpose (RDN) and Red Holstein (RH).

More »

Table 3 Expand

Table 4.

Mean inbreeding coefficients calculated from ROH with minimum length of 4 (FROH>4), 8 (FROH>8), and 16 (FROH>16) Mb, from the excess of homozygosity (FHOM) and from pedigree (FPED) for Angler (RVA), Red-and-White dual-purpose (RDN) and Red Holstein (RH).

More »

Table 4 Expand

Fig 4.

Regression plot of FROH>4Mb (A), FROH>8Mb (B) and FROH>16Mb (C) on FPED (left) and on FHOM (right) for Angler (green) and Red-and-White dual-purpose (blue). The broken line (black) is a regression line for both breeds and corresponds to the regression equation presented.

More »

Fig 4 Expand

Fig 5.

Principal component analysis of 14 cattle breeds distinguished by shape and colour.

Based on 19,971 SNPs, the first four components together accounted for 61.7% of variation in the data.

More »

Fig 5 Expand

Fig 6.

Admixture graphs for k = 2, 5, 9, 13 and 19 with the optimal cluster level marked with an arrow.

The amount of a colour in a cluster reflects a breed’s proportion of genetic variation originating from that colour. Breed names are coloured according to geographical origin: Germany (red), Northern Europe (grey), Norway (green), Channel Islands (dark red), Switzerland (blue), France (purple), Scotland (brown) and Burkina Faso (orange).

More »

Fig 6 Expand

Fig 7.

Visualization of high-resolution population networks for 14 cattle breeds.

K-NN = 10 (A) investigated small-scale structures, K-NN = 100 (B) targeted large-scale structures and breeds are distinguished by node colour.

More »

Fig 7 Expand

Fig 8.

Network visualisation of 14 cattle breeds effectively separated along geographical lines with K-NN = 35.

Admixture results at k = 19 were included in the network construction (in Box) such that node colouration reflects individual level of admixture.

More »

Fig 8 Expand