Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Table 1.

MRI and FDG PET fusion classification accuracies (%).

More »

Table 1 Expand

Fig 1.

Pre-processing pipeline for a single subject.

A subject has N MRI scanning sessions and M PET scanning sessions; therefore, the pipeline yields N MRI images and M PET images. The pipeline is repeated for each subject in the dataset.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Fig 2.

Convolutional neural network for one modality.

A single MRI or PET volume is taken as input, and the output is a binary diagnosis label of either “Healthy” or “AD”.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Fig 3.

Convolutional neural network for fusing MRI and PET modalities.

An MRI and PET scan from a single patient is taken as input, and the output is again a binary diagnosis label.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Table 2.

MRI and amyloid PET fusion classification accuracies (%).

More »

Table 2 Expand

Table 3.

Classification subject age and gender breakdown.

More »

Table 3 Expand