Table 1.
m-health applications categories and re-categorization as per WHO.
Fig 1.
Conceptual framework of TOE determinants and m-health adoption.
Table 2.
National distribution of hospitals by categories of ownership and classification of levels.
Table 3.
Distribution of level 4 hospitals by types of providers/ownership (N = 485).
Table 4.
Summary of reliability tests.
Fig 2.
Distribution of adoption of the 12 WHO classified m-health applications.
Number of non-adopters of each m-health application designated with an orange square; Number of adopters of each m-health application designated with a blue square.
Table 5.
Distribution of adoption status by level of hospital, ownership and geographical locations.
Table 6.
Results of omnibus tests, goodness of fit summary and hosmer-lemeshow test for technological determinants.
Table 7.
PC m-health application adoption and technological determinants.
Table 8.
FC m-health application adoption and technological determinants.
Table 9.
Model result of hypothesis on technological determinants.
Table 10.
Results of omnibus tests, goodness of fit summary and hosmer-lemeshow test for organizational determinants.
Table 11.
PC m-health applications adoption and organizational determinants.
Table 12.
FC m-health applications adoption and organizational determinants.
Table 13.
Model result of the hypothesis on organizational determinants.
Table 14.
Results of omnibus tests, goodness of fit summary and hosmer-lemeshow test for environmental determinants.
Table 15.
PC m-health applications adoption and environmental determinants.
Table 16.
FC m-health applications adoption and environmental determinants.
Table 17.
Model result of hypothesis on industry’s environmental determinants.
Table 18.
PC m-health applications on adoption and combined TOE effect variables.
Table 19.
FC m-health applications on adoption and combined TOE effect variables.
Table 20.
Summary of the TOE model results of the hypotheses.
Table 21.
A summary of the TOE model results of the hypotheses.