Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Fig 1.

Flow of participants in the study.

Flow of participants in the study showing number of participants who were assessed at each follow-up, T0—T3. All randomised participants are included in the analysis (n = 143). Recruitment and inclusion were performed in two steps. *Twenty participants were admitted for a second hip fracture within two years and were already participants in a study on orthogeriatric care.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Table 1.

Demographics and baseline clinical characteristics (n = 143).

More »

Table 1 Expand

Fig 2.

Results from the linear mixed model for the primary outcome, Gait Speed, estimated differences in mean gait speed between the interventions (Intervention (I)–Controls (C)), with 95% CI, and for four secondary outcomes (SPPB, Upright time, MMSE, and Nottingham E-ADL).

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Table 2.

Estimated between group differences in change for primary and secondary clinical outcomes and costs.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Fig 3.

The cost-effectiveness plane (left, Fig 3A) and cost-effectiveness acceptability curve (right, Fig 3B).

More »

Fig 3 Expand