Table 1.
Histological staining methods used in the study.
Table 2.
Data of patients.
Fig 1.
Wall composition in AAA (left and middle columns) and non-AAA samples (right column).
In the AAA samples, the collagen was more abundant (A), the elastin was partially or mostly destroyed (B), the wall contained more vasa vasorum (D), expressed more hypoxia markers (E) and less contractile phenotype of vascular smooth muscle (C, F). Stained with picrosirius red (A), orcein (B), and immunohistochemistry with anti-smooth muscle actin antibody (C) for visualization of the contractile phenotype of vascular smooth muscle cells, anti-CD31 (D) for visualization of endothelium, anti-HIF 1-alpha (E) for visualization of tissue hypoxia and anti-desmin (F) for visualization of the contractile phenotype of vascular smooth muscle cells; nuclei were stained with Gill’s hematoxylin; scale bar 50 μm.
Fig 2.
Wall composition in AAA (left and middle column) and non-AAA samples (right column).
The AAA samples were more infiltrated by macrophages (A), neutrophils (B), T lymphocytes (D) and B lymphocytes (E). The distribution of osteoprotegerin (OPG) was more diffuse in non-AAA (C). The expression of pentraxin 3 was greater in AAA samples (F). Stained immunohistochemistry with anti-MAC387 antibody (A) for visualization of macrophages, anti-osteoprotegerin (B), anti-myeloperoxidase (C) for visualization of neutrophilic granulocytes, anti-CD3 (D) for visualization of T lymphocytes, anti-CD20 (E) for visualization of B lymphocytes, anti-pentraxin 3 (F); nuclei were stained with Gill’s hematoxylin; scale bar 50 μm.
Table 3.
Testing the differences between the AAA vs. the non-AAA samples of aortic wall.
Fig 3.
Correlations of the examined histological parameters, in AAA samples.
All correlations significant at p<0.05 are highlighted in boldface. AA(component, space): Area fraction of the respective components within their reference spaces; QA: number of microvessel profiles per section area; int+media: data pooled from the intima and media; wall: data pooled from the wall (i.e., from intima, media and adventitia). Abbreviations of all the examined parameters are explained in S2 Table.
Fig 4.
Correlations of the examined histological parameters, in all samples.
All correlations significant at p<0.05 are highlighted in boldface. AA(component, space): Area fraction of the respective components within their reference spaces; QA: number of microvessel profiles per section area; int+media: data pooled from the intima and media; wall: data pooled from the wall (i.e., from intima, media and adventitia). The abbreviations of all the parameters are explained in S2 Table.
Fig 5.
Qualitative findings in AAA samples.
A—The basic pattern of the aortic wall was destroyed by newly formed vessels surrounded by inflammatory infiltrates. The elastin fibers (black) were compressed and destroyed. B–The inflammatory cells penetrated among the smooth muscle cells (brown) into the tunica media. C–Lymphocytes (brown) occurred mostly in aggregates resembling lymphoid follicles. D—Rarely, the macrophages (brown) penetrated diffusely the whole wall of the AAA. E–The expression of osteoprotegerin (brown) occurred mostly in the areas infiltrated by leukocytes. F–Similarly, the positivity of pentraxin 3 (brown) also occurred in areas infiltrated by leukocytes. Stained with Verhoeff’s hematoxylin and green trichrome (A) and immunohistochemistry with an antibody against smooth muscle actin (B) for visualization of the contractile phenotype of vascular smooth muscle cells, anti-CD20 (C) for visualization of B lymphocytes, anti-MAC387 (D) for visualization of macrophages, anti-osteoprotegerin (anti-OPG) (E) and anti-pentraxin 3 (anti-PTX3) (F); nuclei were stained with Gill’s hematoxylin; scale bar 100 μm (A, B), 500 μm (C, D) and 50 μm (E, F).