Fig 1.
The plant morphology of S. tamariscina and S. moellendorfii at different relative water contents.
A; S. tamariscina at a relative water content of 100%; B; S. tamariscina at a relative water content of 50%; C; S. moellendorfii at a relative water content of 100%; D; S. moellendorfii at a relative water content of 50%.
Fig 2.
A heatmap of DEGs of S. tamariscina and S. moellendorfii.
St-100, S. tamariscina at a RWC of 100%; St-50, S. tamariscina at a RWC of 50%; Sm-100, S. moellendorfii at a RWC of 100%; Sm-50, S. moellendorfii at a RWC of 50%.
Fig 3.
Go term classification of DEGs in S. tamariscina and S. moellendorfii.
A; S. tamariscina; B, S. moellendorfii.
Table 1.
Pathways significantly enriched in S. tamariscina and S. moellendorffii under drought stress.
Fig 4.
Determination of physiological indicators of S. tamariscina under different dehydration stress.
A; the change of the RWC; B-C; the activities of POD, CAT; D; the content of trehalose.
Fig 5.
Gene expression profiles of S. tamariscina under different dehydration stress.
A-N;Relative quantitation of the ST27G60, ST225G21, ST441G130, ST48G551, ST212G10, ST57G70, ST378G1108, ST39G41, ST285G03, ST104G12, ST836G022, ST188G03, ST55G715, ST75G63; O, Melting curve of PCR reaction.
Fig 6.
The comprehensive regulatory network of S. tamariscina under drought conditions.