Table 1.
Measurement conditions for imo and the Humphrey Field Analyzer (HFA).
Table 2.
Participants’ demographic and ocular characteristics.
Fig 1.
Comparison of the actual threshold value at each test point between the Humphrey Field Analyzer (HFA) and imo.
The data are expressed as mean ± standard deviation. The actual threshold value at each test point between HFA (Fig 1A) and imo (Fig 1B), with corresponding p values (Fig 1C), are shown. The black area represents the blind spot. Data are expressed in dB. The grey area represents high HFA thresholds, compared with imo. The orange area represents high imo thresholds, compared with HFA.
Table 3.
Comparison of reliability indices and global indices measured with the Humphrey Field Analyzer (HFA) and imo.
Fig 2.
Scatter plots and Bland–Altman plots of the reliability indices between the Humphrey Field Analyzer (HFA) and imo.
The scatter and Bland–Altman plots for fixation loss (FL, A and D), false-positive (FP, B and E), and false-negative (FN, C and F) rate are shown in these figures. Correlation coefficient (r) and p values are depicted in the scatter plots (A–C). The mean difference (black solid line) and its 95% confidence interval (CI, dashed line) and limits of agreement (LoA, dotted line) are shown in the Bland–Altman plots (D–F). The solid red line represents the best-fit line for proportional bias.
Fig 3.
Scatter plots and Bland–Altman plots of the global indices between the Humphrey Field Analyzer (HFA) and imo.
The scatter plots and Bland–Altman plots of mean deviation (MD, A and D), visual field index (VFI, B and E), and pattern standard deviation (PSD, C and F) rate are shown in these figures, respectively. Correlation coefficient (r) and p values are shown in the scatter plots (A–C). The mean difference (black solid line) and its 95% confidence interval (CI, dashed line) and limits of agreement (LoA, dotted line) are shown in Bland–Altman plots (D–F). The solid red line shows the best-fit line for proportional bias.
Fig 4.
Scatter plots and Bland–Altman plots of visual field (VF) sensitivity at each test point between the Humphrey Field Analyzer (HFA) and imo.
The scatter plots and Bland–Altman plots of visual field (VF) sensitivity at each test point (A and B) are shown in these figures, respectively. Correlation coefficient (r) and p values are shown in the scatter plots (A). The mean difference (black solid line) and its 95% confidence interval (CI, dashed line) and limits of agreement (LoA, dotted line) are shown in the Bland–Altman plots (B). The solid red line shows the best-fit line for proportional bias.