Fig 1.
Types of levels of human body composition.
A) According to level of analysis B) According to degree of accuracy of referent or field tests.
Table 1.
Characteristics and body composition of the participants.
Table 2.
Inter-methods differences in fat mass estimation: BIA (athlete and non-athlete equations) and Durnin & Womersley anthropometry (DW-ANT) against DXA.
Table 3.
Inter-methods differences in muscle mass and bone mineral content estimation: anthropometry (DK-ANT) against DXA.
Fig 2.
Comparison of predicted percentage of fat mass (FM %) between Durnin & Womersley anthropometry (DW-ANT) and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) in climbers by Bland and Altman plots.
The central line represents inter-method differences. Upper and lower broken lines represent the 95% limit of agreement (inter-methods difference ± 1.96 sd of the differences).
Fig 3.
Comparison of predicted muscle mass (kg) between Deborah-Kerr anthropometry (DK-ANT) and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) in climbers by Bland and Altman plots.
Central line represents inter-method differences. Upper and lower broken lines represent the 95% limit of agreement (inter-method difference ± 1.96 sd of the differences).