Table 1.
Categorical variable derived from the text analysis of participant answers to open questions.
Table 2.
Methods of multivariate data analysis that were combined to produce a typology of PPPs and classification rules.
Fig 1.
Distribution of the response rate and number of PPP examples according to OIE regions and respondent sectors.
(A and B) Response rate from public sector respondents (OIE delegates); (C) response rate from private sector respondents.
Fig 2.
General PPP objectives as described by public respondents (solid bars) and private respondents (hatched bars).
Fig 3.
Modalities implemented under PPPs and reported by public respondents (solid bars) and private respondents (hatched bars).
Fig 4.
Geographic distribution of the different types of private partners involved in the PPPs described by public respondents.
Fig 5.
Distribution of the different types of private partners involved according to the PPP objectives, as described by public respondents.
Fig 6.
The different types of interactions reported in the PPPs.
PPP interactions as described by (A) the public respondent and (B) private respondents (solid bars) and re-qualified by the analysis (hatched bars).
Fig 7.
Types of main private partners involved in the PPPs reported by public respondents according to the different types of interactions.
Fig 8.
Distribution of different types of governance mechanisms reported by public respondents.
Fig 9.
Key success factors and obstacles of PPPs.
Key success factors (right side) and obstacles (left side) of PPPs reported by public respondents (solid bars) and private respondents (hatched bars) and classified in five different categories: goal alignment and mobilization, resources, implementation, enabling environment and follow-up.
Fig 10.
Key success factors and obstacles of PPPs reported by public respondents for the four major types of main private partners involved.
Fig 11.
The three clusters of PPPs reported in the survey and analyzed by multiple correspondence analysis (MCA) and hierarchical clustering.
The first two dimensions accounted for 20% of the PPP variance. The three clusters identified by MCA and K-means methods are displayed as circles including the PPP initiatives and the main variables characterizing the clusters are highlighted: cluster 1 (green circle and boxes); cluster 2 (orange circle and boxes); cluster 3 (blue circle and boxes).
Table 3.
Main variable categories associated with the three PPP clusters identified in the factorial analysis.
Fig 12.
Typology of PPPs in the field of Veterinary Services.