Fig 1.
Schematic illustration of the procedure used in Experiments 1 and 2.
Fig 2.
Mean temporal standardized error for the two ranges of interval durations (seconds and minutes) in the meditation and the control group (bar errors = standard errors).
Table 1.
Scores on the self-reported scales.
Table 2.
Correlation matrix between the standardized temporal error in the seconds and the minutes range and the scores on the different scales.
Table 3.
Mediating indirect effects on the significant relationship between the mediation exercise and both the time estimates (standardized errors) in the seconds and the minutes range and the passage of time judgment.
The bootstrapping mediating method developed by Hayes [46] was used with 95% confident intervals. Coefficients were considered significant when 95% CI did not cross zero (n = 60, 5000 bootstrapping).
Fig 3.
Time estimates and passage of time judgment.
(A) Mean (SE) temporal standardized error and (B) mean (SE) passage of time judgment in the meditation and the control group for the minute duration range.
Fig 4.
Mean (SE) percentage of agreement for attentional demand, task difficulty, arousal and focus on the present moment in the meditation and the control condition.
Table 4.
Fixed effect of judgments on the temporal standardized error or the passage of time judgment using the Linear mixed model.
Table 5.
Mediating indirect effects on the association between the mediation exercise and the time estimates (standardized errors) or the passage of time judgment.