Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Fig 1.

Schematic overview of the HF classification scheme.

Table presents age and sex distribution of individuals with HF belonging to the various subphenotyping bins.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Table 1.

FHS criteria for a heart failure diagnosis.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Table 2.

Characteristics of participants without overt HF (sample 1).

More »

Table 2 Expand

Table 3.

Association between subphenotypes and various echocardiographic and arterial stiffness measures in individuals without overt HF (sample 1).

More »

Table 3 Expand

Table 4.

Characteristics of individuals with HFrEF according to subphenotype category (N = 465).

More »

Table 4 Expand

Table 5.

Characteristics of individuals with HFpEF according to subphenotype category (N = 372).

More »

Table 5 Expand

Table 6.

Age and sex adjusted 10-year mortality by group.

More »

Table 6 Expand

Fig 2.

Hazards ratio associated with various subphenotypes for all-cause mortality.

Panel A refers to the results from a Cox model including only HFrEF patients, the CHD subgroup served as the referent. Similar, panel B illustrates to the results from a sub-analysis including only HFpEF patients. The panel C shows within each subgroup comparison of mortality risk in HFpEF vs. HFrEF.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Fig 3.

Hazards ratio associated with various subphenotypes for cardiovascular mortality.

Panel A refers to the results from a Cox model including only HFrEF patients, the CHD subgroup served as the referent. Similar, panel B illustrates to the results from a sub-analysis including only HFpEF patients. The panel C shows within each subgroup comparison of mortality risk in HFpEF vs. HFrEF.

More »

Fig 3 Expand