Table 1.
Selected definitions of agritourism.
Table 2.
Selected definitions of rural tourism.
Table 3.
Number of agritourism farms in Poland.
Table 4.
Diagnostic features used to formulate the Hellwig’s synthetic indicator of natural attractiveness.
Table 5.
Diagnostic features used to formulate the Hellwig’s synthetic indicator of cultural attractiveness.
Fig 1.
Natural attractiveness of Polish districts (based on the synthetic characteristic).
Value of synthetic indicators: Class 1: 0 ≥ 0,060. Class 2: 0,060 ≥ 0,120. Class 3: 0,120 ≥ 0,179. Class 4: 0,179 ≥ 0,362. Source: own study based on Table 4 data and S1 Table.
Fig 2.
Cultural attractiveness of Polish districts (based on the synthetic characteristic).
Value of synthetic indicators: Class 1: 0 ≥ 0,052. Class 2: 0,052 ≥ 0,104. Class 3: 0,104 ≥ 0,157. Class 4: 0,157 ≥ 0,364. Source: own study based on Table 5 data and S2 Table.
Fig 3.
Number of beds in agritourism accommodation facilities per 100 km2.
Number of beds / 100 km2. Class 1: 0 ≥ 0,1. Class 2: 0,1 ≥ 5. Class 3: 5 ≥ 10. Class 4: 10 ≥. Source: own calculations based on https://bdl.stat.gov.pl/ and S3 Table.
Fig 4.
Amount of agritourism investments supported with EU funds (PLN/km2).
Value of agritourism investments supported by EU (PLN/ km2). Class 1: 0 ≥ 650. Class 2: 650 ≥ 1300. Class 3: 1300 ≥ 2500. Class 4: 2500 ≥. Source: own study based on [27] and S3 Table.
Table 6.
Pearson’s linear correlation coefficient for the phenomena under consideration.