Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Table 1.

Comparison of parameters in patients with dry eye and normal control subjects.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Table 2.

Comparison of blink rate and other parameters during perimetry in patients with dry eye and normal control subjects.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Fig 1.

Scatter diagrams of the relationships between blink rates before and during perimetry.

(A) Data for patients with dry eye. (B) Data for normal control subjects. Group 1; eyes with decreased blink rates during perimetry in patients with dry eye; Group 2; eyes with increased or unchanged blink rates during perimetry in patients with dry eye; Group 3; eyes with decreased blink rates during perimetry in normal control subjects; Group 4; eyes with increased or unchanged blink rates during perimetry in normal control subjects.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Fig 2.

Scatter diagrams of the relationships between TFBUT before perimetry and TFBUT after perimetry.

(A) Data for patients with dry eye. (B) Data for normal control subjects. TFBUT, tear film break-up time.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Fig 3.

Scatter diagrams of the relationships between VB score before perimetry and VB score after perimetry.

(A) Data for patients with dry eye. (B) Data for normal control subjects. VB score, van Bijsterveld score.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Table 3.

Spearman correlation coefficients between tear conditions, ocular surface findings, and perimetry reliability parameters in patients with dry eye and normal control subjects.

More »

Table 3 Expand