Fig 1.
Black stars on the map represent the stakeholder institutions (see IDs in Table 1). Green shading indicates major Pontocaspian habitats.
Table 1.
List of the 17 selected stakeholders from Romania divided into three stakeholder categories.
Fig 2.
Sociogram of Romanian stakeholders involved in Pontocaspian biodiversity conservation and conservation planning.
Nodes represent organizations (see Table 1 for institution acronyms). The size of the nodes corresponds to the node strength (sum of weights of all its links). Arrows represent relationships between the nodes. Black arrows represent strong relationships (value ≥3). Gray arrows represent weak relationships (value < 3).
Table 2.
Network statistics for Romanian stakeholder network compared to the previously published Ukrainian stakeholder network (in grey) [17].
Fig 3.
Frequencies of interaction themes among the stakeholder organizations.
Values in the pie charts represent absolute number of times each theme was mentioned. See theme definitions in S2 Table.
Table 3.
Node-specific centrality measures and interaction categories from Romania.
Table 4.
Stakeholder group relations.