Table 1.
Stereotypicality score for feminine experimental role nouns as determined from the findings of Misersky et al.
Table 2.
Stereotypicality score for masculine experimental role nouns as determined from the findings of Misersky et al.
Table 3.
Stereotypicality score for non-stereotyped experimental role nouns as determined from the findings of Misersky et al.
Table 4.
Typicality of female and male first names as indicated by response time results from the findings of Öttl.
Table 5.
Effect sizes for the fixed effects in the model ‘effect of Version (web-based vs. Laboratory Based) on positive responses.
Table shows the estimated effect size and 95% confidence intervals. Intercept included Masculine Roles, Female Names, and Version Web as contrast levels.
Fig 1.
The effect of Stereotype and Name Gender on response.
Error bars indicate the 95% confidence interval.
Table 6.
The effect of the two-way interaction between Stereotype and Name Gender on response.
Table shows mean positive response (%) and 95% confidence interval for each name/role pairing, rounded to the nearest full percentage.
Fig 2.
The effect of Version, Stereotype, and Name Gender on response.
Error bars indicate the 95% confidence interval.
Table 7.
The effect of the three-way interaction between Version, Stereotype, and Name Gender on response.
Table shows mean positive response (%) and 95% confidence interval for each name/role pairing, rounded to the nearest full percentage.
Table 8.
Effect sizes for the fixed effects in the model ‘effect of Version (web-based vs. Laboratory Based) on positive responses.
Table shows the estimated effect size and 95% confidence intervals. Intercept included Masculine Roles, Female Names, and Version Web as contrast levels.
Fig 3.
The main effect of Version on response time.
Error bars indicate the 95% confidence interval.
Fig 4.
The effect of Stereotype and Name Gender on response time.
Error bars indicate the 95% confidence interval.
Table 9.
The effect of the two-way interaction between Stereotype and Name Gender on response time.
Table shows mean response time (ms), SD, and 95% confidence interval for each name/role pairing.
Fig 5.
The effect of Version, Stereotype, and Name Gender on response time.
Error bars indicate the 95% confidence interval.
Table 10.
The effect of the three-way interaction between Version, Stereotype, and Name Gender on response time.
Table shows mean response time (ms), SD, and 95% confidence interval for each name/role pairing.