Fig 1.
End-to-end coreference resolution for Basque.
Fig 2.
The architecture of the Basque coreference resolution system.
Table 1.
Examples to illustrate the suitability of the Exact Morphology Match sieve.
Table 2.
EPEC corpus division information.
Table 3.
Performance of baseline and EUSKOR systems with automatic mentions.
Table 4.
Performance of baseline and EUSKOR systems with gold mentions.
Table 5.
Performance of baseline and EUSKOR systems with gold mention boundaries.
Table 6.
Hand-built ordering and Learned ordering.
Table 7.
Performance of EUSKOR when sieves are added incrementally.
Table 8.
Results obtained when automatic mentions are used.
1=EUSKOR, 2=1+Wiki sieve, 3=1+Synonymy sieve, 4=1+Wiki sieve+Synonymy sieve.
Table 9.
Results obtained when gold mentions are used.
1=EUSKOR, 2=1+Wiki sieve, 3=1+Synonymy sieve, 4=1+Wiki sieve+Synonymy sieve.
Table 10.
Comparison of performance of adapted Stanford and BART systems.