Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Fig 1.

Mocap markers positioning.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Fig 2.

Sketch of the derived measured quantities: Spine bend (left) and barbell-foot distance (right).

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Fig 3.

Non-dimensional spine bend distributions for points of performance spine and combination and control condition.

Instruction group (left plot) and sonification group (right plot).

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Table 1.

Distributions of non-dimensional spine bend for all points of performance and control.

For the normally distributed variables, means, standard deviations, t-values, and significance p are reported. Medians, z-values and significance p values for the non-normally distributed ones.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Fig 4.

Non-dimensional barbell-foot distance distributions for points of performance spine and combination and control condition.

Instruction group (left plot) and sonification group (right plot).

More »

Fig 4 Expand

Table 2.

Distributions of non-dimensional barbell-foot distance for all points of performance and control.

For the normally distributed variables, means, standard deviations, t-values, and significance p are reported. Medians, z-values, and significance p values for the non-normally distributed ones.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Table 3.

Comparisons of non-dimensional spine bend for point of performance combination of both feedback (instruction and sonification) with respect to the control condition and between each other.

Significance is highlighted with an asterisk (*).

More »

Table 3 Expand

Fig 5.

Comparison of spine bend distribution between instruction and sonification feedback with respect to control for point of performance combination.

More »

Fig 5 Expand

Table 4.

Comparisons of non-dimensional barbell-foot distance for point of performance combination of both feedback types (instruction and sonification) with respect to the control condition and between each other.

Significance is highlighted with an asterisk (*).

More »

Table 4 Expand

Fig 6.

Comparison of barbell-foot distance distribution between instruction and sonification feedback with respect to control for point of performance combination.

More »

Fig 6 Expand

Table 5.

Comparisons of movement improvements between feedback types (instruction and sonification) for point of performance combination.

Non-dimensional spine bend improvement and non-dimensional barbell-foot distance on first and second row respectively. Means, standard deviation and t-values are reported for normally distributed quantities, medians and z-values for non-normally distributed ones.

More »

Table 5 Expand