Table 1.
Definition and summary statistics of covariates.
Table 2.
Summary statistics for FAW knowledge questions and scores (% correct responses).
Fig 1.
Percentage of households exposed to the major campaign channels (n = 603).
Fig note: Two households each were exposed to SMS only and SMS+Video, making a total of 607 sample households.
Fig 2.
The main FAW management practices implemented by sample households.
Fig notes: ***, **, * indicate significant differences between campaign participants and non-participants at the 1%, 5% and 10% significance levels, respectively. [Participants (n = 460; non-participants (n = 147)]. Other FAW management practices that were implemented by very few of the sample farmers include the application of botanical pesticides, trap cropping or planting of repellent plants, and the use of biological control methods.
Table 3.
Logit estimates for participation in the extension campaign.
Table 4.
Impacts of the campaign on farmers’ knowledge and management of FAW.
Table 5.
Impact estimates using radio campaign as the control group.