Table 1.
Definitions of characteristics of the social network examined in this study [26, 29, 30].
Table 2.
Characteristics of CHC in the rural and urban community unit.
Table 3.
Summary of information that was directly exchanged between CHCs and four actors in both the rural and urban slum community units.
Fig 1.
Social network for the rural CHC whose context is in a pastoral, rural community in Kajiado County.
Note: Arrows in the sociograms indicate direction of the information flow. Reciprocal information exchange is indicated by the double arrows. Blue circles denote individuals who originate from the rural community and red boxes denote actors who represent government institutions. The size of the nodes corresponds to their degree of centrality.
Fig 2.
Social network for the urban slum CHC in Nairobi County.
Note: Blue circles denote individuals who originate from the rural community and red boxes denote actors who represent government institutions. The size of the nodes corresponds to their degree of centrality. The triangle represents NGOs that implement health programs at community level.
Table 4.
Degree of centrality and betweenness in the rural and urban slum CHC’s social network.