Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Fig 1.

Five different illumination geometries common for light microscopy.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Fig 2.

Generalised optical microscope.

Illumination and detection optics can be at a relative angle. Without loss of generality, the magnification is assumed to be equal to one.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Fig 3.

Boundary and source of the heat equation for line-confocal illumination.

Left: cuboid sample (∞ × 2l × 2l) surrounded by a thermal reservoir of temperature u0 and typical illumination shape IP(r,t) of a line-confocal microscope. Right: evolution of irradiance with illumination period T.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Table 1.

Strategies to solve the heat equation for a wide range of illumination periods T and different illumination geometries.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Table 2.

Waist diameter of the elliptic Gaussian beam defining the illumination geometry IP(r).

More »

Table 2 Expand

Fig 4.

Maximal permissible peak irradiance IP0(T) for five different illumination geometries depending parametrically on the illumination period T using a 0.8 NA lens.

The sample is assumed to consist mainly of water. The vacuum illumination wavelength is chosen to be λ = 550 nm. The maximal permissible temperature rise is arbitrarily set to ucrit - u0 = 10 K and the absorption coefficient is set to μa = 1 mm-1. Solid lines describe infinitely extended samples (heat never reaches the thermal reservoir) and dashed lines describe samples of a finite size with a cuboid shape: 2l × 2l × ∞ for line-confocal and line illumination and 2l × ∞ × ∞ for light sheet illumination. Results of the thermally stationary state are calculated with FEM and match the analytical solution.

More »

Fig 4 Expand

Fig 5.

Temperature factor uf(T) for five different illumination geometries depending parametrically on the illumination period T using a 0.8 NA lens.

Like Fig 4 but normalised against the absorption coefficient μa and the maximal permissible temperature rise (ucrit - u0).

More »

Fig 5 Expand

Table 3.

Image scanning types.

The illumination period T is given by the total 2D image acquisition time T0.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Fig 6.

Theoretical SNRN comparison of aqueous sample images consisting of 1000 × 1000 spectra, using a 0.8 NA objective lens.

We assume an illumination wavelength of λ = 550 nm, temperature limited irradiance, ideal hyperspectral sensors (except grey line): efficiency η = 1 and a noise condition parameter qs = 0. Solid lines describe infinitely extended samples (heat never reaches the thermal reservoir) and dashed lines describe samples of a finite size with cuboid shape: 2l × 2l × ∞ for line-confocal and line illumination and 2l × ∞ × ∞ for light sheet illumination. The grey curve represents a light sheet system equipped with a 1000 channel filter based hyperspectral detector. Assuming a constant spectral light distribution and shot noise only the SNR drops by a factor of square root of 1000 compared to the ideal hyperspectral detector (red curve). Notice: the irradiance is adjusted parametrically with acquisition time T0 according to Fig 5, to always meet the permissible temperature rise in the sample.

More »

Fig 6 Expand

Fig 7.

Like Fig 6 but for 50 × 50 spectra.

Notice, that for a shrinking number of pixels (accompanied by a shrinking field of view), all methods (apart from grey) exhibit similar performance (graphs shift along T0) because they become essentially more and more scanning approaches.

More »

Fig 7 Expand