Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Table 1.

qPCR primers and probes used in this study.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Fig 1.

Average relative abundances of phyla among sample types.

Included in “Other” are phyla that individually make up less than 1% of total abundance: Nitrospirae, Armatimonadetes, Spirochaetes, Synergistetes, Latescibacteria, BRC1, Parcubacteria, Microgenomates, Chlamydiae, Deferribacteres, Fibrobacteres, Candidatus Saccharibacteria, Elusimicrobia, candidate division WPS-2, SR1, Lentisphaerae, Hydrogenedentes, Cloacimonetes, Ignavibacteriae, Deinococcus-Thermus, and Fusobacteria.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Fig 2.

Alpha diversity indices of microbiome samples.

Boxplots represent 25th to 75th percentiles and whiskers showing a maximum of 1.5x the interquartile range (IQR). Different letters indicate significant differences within the alpha diversity indexes (P<0.05).

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Fig 3.

Comparison of community composition between soil and manure line samples.

Community composition varied significantly between all samples except between the spring samples. Spring time 1 and spring time 2 soil are combined as spring soil. Clustering is based on nonmetric multidimensional scaling analysis of samples according to Bray-Curtis distances. Manure was excluded from the NMDS plot to show variation of soil samples.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Fig 4.

Average relative abundance of manure associated OTUs.

OTUs are classified as manure associated if abundances were significantly greater (P<0.05) in manure compared to fall pre-manure soil.

More »

Fig 4 Expand

Fig 5.

Relative abundance of target genes to 16S rRNA copy number.

Different letters indicate significant differences (P<0.05). n = 10 for manure. n = 20 for soil samples.

More »

Fig 5 Expand