Fig 1.
Summary of the research process and number of participants at each stage.
*Many participants were in the same class and, therefore, teachers completed feedback questionnaires on more than one participant.
Table 1.
Tests attempted to ascertain visual status and success rates achieved at baseline.
Table 2.
Prevalence of significant refractive error in the present study.
Table 3.
Anomalies of ocular health or structure noted during the internal and external ocular examination.
Table 4.
Prevalence and type of ocular alignment anomalies.
Table 5.
Percentage (n) of participants presenting with significant visual deficits at baseline, the proportion of these visual deficits which were unrecognised and/or unaddressed and, as such, defined as an ‘unmet visual need’, at baseline and follow-up.
Table 6.
Observed classroom behaviours at baseline vs follow-up using paired data from individual participants’ two measurement periods.