Fig 1.
The top part shows the timeline for the Sleep and Wake participants from training to retest. The bottom part describes the word pairs training and retest protocol.
Fig 2.
Results from Ellenbogen et al. (2009) (Left) are compared to findings from the current study (Right). Results for “no interference” represent recall from the initial retest, prior to interference learning. “Interference” results represent recall of originally-learned B words following interference learning.
Table 1.
Correlations between indices of intrinsic motivation from the Intrinsic Motivation Inventory, training performance and change in performance from training to retest.
Fig 3.
Points represent the size of the Sleep x Interference interaction effect as reported by Ellenbogen et al. (2009), and in the current study (partial eta squared). Error bars represent the 90% confidence interval on this effect. The Ellenbogen et al. 2009 effect falls well outside the 90% confidence interval of the current, more precise effect size estimate.