Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Fig 1.

Study design.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Table 1.

Patient demographics and baseline characteristics (analysis set).

More »

Table 1 Expand

Fig 2.

Patient disposition.

eCRF, electronic case report form; BID, twice daily administration; QD, once daily administration.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Fig 3.

Kaplan–Meier plot for the relapse in patients with ulcerative colitis who achieved clinical remission and mucosal healing by treatment with budesonide foam for 6 weeks in the phase 2 or phase 3 clinical trials in Japan.

The median survival time (year) without relapse was 0.82 (95% CI: 0.51 to 1.52).

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Table 2.

Proportion of patients with/without relapse during the observation period by covariates.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Table 3.

Estimated hazard ratio (HR) with Cox regression model.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Fig 4.

Kaplan–Meier plot for the relapse in patients with ulcerative colitis who achieved clinical remission and mucosal healing by treatment with budesonide foam in phase 2 or phase 3 clinical trials in Japan by a covariate.

(A) endoscopic subscore: MES = 0 (broken line) and MES = 1 (solid line) at start of this study, each median survival time (year) was 1.02 (95% CI: 0.61 to 1.66) and 0.54 (95% CI: 0.23 to 1.95), respectively. There was no significant difference between the groups (log-rank test, P = 0.275). (B) The disease duration: duration of <1 year(broken line), duration of 1–5 years (solid line), duration of ≥5 years (thin solid line). Each median survival times (year) were 0.28 (95% CI: 0.17 to 1.03), 0.97 (95% CI: 0.49 to 1.97), 0.93 (95% CI: 0.40 to 1.66), respectively. There was no significant difference between Group 1, 2 and 3 (log-rank test, P = 0.055). (C) Patients receiving budesonide foam, QD (broken line) and BID (solid line), each median survival times (year) were 0.54 (95% CI: 0.19 to 1.02) and 1.03 (95% CI: 0.61 to 1.83), respectively. There was no significant difference between Group 1 and Group 2 (log-rank test, P = 0.106).

More »

Fig 4 Expand