Fig 1.
Detection of the XBP1 gene expression using the semi-quantitative polymerase chain reaction (semi-qPCR).
(A) Semi-qPCR analysis of unspliced/spliced (u/s) XBP1 and housekeeping genes (GAPDH, HPRT, or H2afz) using porcine ear skin fibroblast cells (pESF) following 0–6 h supplementation with tunicamycin at 2 μg/mL (TM; left panel). Densitometric analysis of the u/sXBP1 band intensities (right panel). GAPDH, HPRT, or H2afz was used as a normalization control (except in the first panel). Values represent the mean ± standard error (SE) (n = 3; *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01). (B) Semi-qPCR analysis of housekeeping genes (GAPDH, HPRT, H2afz, 18S rRNA, or ActB) during the early embryonic development stage (2-cell, 4-cell, morula, and blastocysts) in bovine, porcine, and mouse embryos. Three pools of 20 embryos were used for each developmental stage. (C) To measure the transcript levels of sXBP1, an indicator of endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress, reverse transcription-PCR band intensities were densitometrically analyzed, and the levels of sXBP1 and uXBP1 relative to total XBP1 were calculated. (D) Semi-qPCR analysis of u/sXBP1 using porcine kidney-derived primary cells (pKDCs) following 6-h supplementation with TM (left panel). Densitometric analysis of the u/sXBP1 band intensity ratio (right panel). Values represent the mean ± SE (n = 3; *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01).
Fig 2.
Primers targeting the u/s/total (t) XBP1-conserved sequence in various species.
(A) The consensus sequence of XBP1 in human, monkey, cow, pig, and mouse. The blue triangle represents the start, and the red triangle represents the end, of the spliced 26 bp intron. The red text indicates the splicing region of XBP1. Black squares indicate the difference sequence of C to U in mice. (B–D) Alignment of the u/s/tXBP1 gene among the five species and the location of each XBP1 primer. The blue triangle indicates the start, and the red triangle indicates the end, of the spliced 26 bp intron. The blue arrow indicates the forward primer and the red arrow indicates the reverse primer.
Fig 3.
Analyses of XBP1 expression in various species using semi-qPCR.
(A) Semi-qPCR analysis of u/s/tXBP1 and housekeeping genes (HPRT or GAPDH) using human embryonic kidney 293 (HEK293), cynomolgus monkey ESF (cmESF), bovine ESF (bESF), porcine ESF (pESF), and mouse embryonic fibroblast (MEF) cells following 0, 1, 6 h supplementation with tunicamycin. (B–D) Densitometric analysis of u/sXBP1 band intensities. The tXBP1 employed for quantification was used as a universal primer, 181 bp in size, as shown in Fig 2D. HPRT, GAPDH, or tXBP1 was used as a normalization control. Values represent the mean ± SE (n = 3; *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01).
Fig 4.
Examining the expression of u/s/tXBP1 during early embryonic development in various species using qPCR.
(A and B) qPCR analyses of the relative abundances of u/s/tXBP1 in porcine embryos at early developmental stages (1-cell, 2-cell, 4-cell, molura, and blastocyst) in the absence and presence of tunicamycin. GAPDH or tXBP1 was used as a normalization control. Values represent the mean ± SE (n = 3; **P < 0.01). (C and D) qPCR analyses of the relative abundances of u/s/tXBP1 in HEK293, cmESF, bESF, pESF, and MEF cells cultured for 0, 1, 6 h with TM. GAPDH or tXBP1 was used as a normalization control. Values represent the mean ± SE (n = 3; *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01).