Table 1.
Differences and similarities between ARIA+ and Cardiac ARIA index methods.
Table 2.
Australian localities by Cardiac ARIA (acute) and ARIA+ Categories.
Red shading indicates good acute cardiac services relative to the ARIA+ category. Blue shading indicates poor acute cardiac services relative to the ARIA+ category. Localities displayed in Fig 1.
Table 3.
Australian localities by Cardiac ARIA (aftercare) and ARIA+ Categories.
Red shading indicates good aftercare cardiac services relative to the ARIA+ category. Blue shading indicates poor aftercare cardiac services relative to the ARIA+ category. Localities displayed in Fig 2.
Fig 1.
The geographical locations of the shaded cells from Table 2 highlighting the main discrepancies between Cardiac ARIA (acute) and the ARIA+ remoteness structure[24] (high acute cardiac services relative to ARIA+) (n = 275).
Fig 2.
The geographical locations of the shaded cells from Table 3 highlighting the main discrepancies between Cardiac ARIA (after) and the ARIA+ remoteness structure[24] (low acute cardiac services relative to ARIA+) (n = 75).
Fig 3.
The geographical locations of the shaded cells from Table 2 highlighting the main discrepancies between Cardiac ARIA (acute) and the ARIA+ remoteness structure[24] (high aftercare cardiac services relative to ARIA+) (n = 876).
Fig 4.
The geographical locations of the shaded cells from Table 3 highlighting the main discrepancies between Cardiac ARIA (aftercare) and the ARIA+ remoteness structure[24] (low aftercare cardiac services relative to ARIA+) (n = 11).