Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Fig 1.

Illustration of the novel evaluation tools.

(A) manual tactile test (B) pinch-holding-up activity test.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Fig 2.

Demonstration of the pinch and load force VS time graph.

The solid line represents the pinch force and the dashed line represents the load force.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Fig 3.

Overall comparison different hand function tests between the patients and the healthy.

***p < .001. Bars are plotted with mean and standard deviation. Each subgraph represents the following: Purdue Pegboard test: (A) dominant hand, (B) non-dominant hand, (C) both hands and (D) assembly; SWM test: (E) thumb and (F) little finger; (G) Grip force; MTT: (H) roughness, (I) shape and (J) weight subtest; PHUA parameters: (K) Static FPPeak, (L) FPPeak, (M) FR, (N) % Static FPPeak and (O) FRNorm.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Table 1.

Basic information of the experiment and control group subjects.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Fig 4.

ROC curves of each hand function assessment tools.

Black lines are from the Purdue Pegboard test, blue lines are from the SWM test, red lines are from the MTT and purple lines are from the PHUA test.

More »

Fig 4 Expand

Table 2.

Statistical outcomes of each test of subjects above or equal to 55 years old.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Table 3.

Statistical outcomes of each test of subjects below 55 years old.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Table 4.

Outcomes from the ROC curves and Youden’s index.

More »

Table 4 Expand